COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »

Before undergoing surgery or other types of medical procedures, patients are asked required to sign a medical waiver or informed consent form. These forms often contain language confirming that the patient understands and accepts certain risks associated with the procedure.

But what happens if the medical procedure goes wrong and the patient is seriously injured? Does the medical waiver form the patient they signed legally prevent her from bringing a medical malpractice lawsuit?

We discuss the legal implications of medical waiver or informed consent forms and whether they limit a patient’s right to sue for medical malpractice when things go wrong.

Below we have settlement stories of lawsuits against medical assistants.  But, first, let’s talk about what a medical assistant is and they are different from nurses. 

Our lawyers bring medical malpractice claims against not only doctors but nurses and medical assistants.  There is a lot of confusion between the two, some of which have legal implications.  This post clears up some of this confusion.

What Is the Difference Between a Registered Nurse and a Medical Assistant?

If you have been injured by the negligence of a nurse or medical assistant, you may be entitled to compensation. Both medical assistants and nurses are considered licensed healthcare professionals, which means that they can be liable for medical malpractice. To hold a nurse or medical assistant liable for malpractice you need to show that they breached the applicable standard of care. The standard of care for a registered nurse will be much different than the standard of care for a medical assistant, so it is important to understand the difference between the two.

Nurses and Medical Assistants Have Different Training and Education Requirements

Slip and fall incidents among elderly residents in nursing homes can be very serious, sometimes even deadly. One out of every three nursing home residents dies within 12 months of going to the hospital for a slip and fall.  That is just an insane statistic.  Our Maryland nursing home lawyers see too many nursing home fall cases with tragic outcomes.

Nursing home negligence is often a major contributing factor when elderly residents fall and injure themselves. In most nursing home fall cases, the negligence involves poor facility maintenance (unkept hallways, wet floors, etc.) or negligent care by staff members (failing to put up bed rails, walking unassisted, etc.).

In some cases, however, elderly residents fall because of underlying health conditions. Orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure) is a health condition that is known to cause sudden falls among elderly nursing home residents. Nursing homes have an obligation to monitor their residents for conditions such as orthostatic hypotension and take appropriate precautions.

If you have been the victim of medical negligence and you have a malpractice lawsuit pending, one of the primary questions you probably have is “how long will it take for my case to settle?” Our Maryland malpractice lawyers get this question all the time from our medical malpractice clients. It is completely reasonable to ask. Medical malpractice victims frequently end up in acute financial distress as treatment bills pile up and they cannot work. Many of our clients end up desperately waiting for a settlement in their malpractice case to bail them out.  This makes the time frame for a settlement more important.

The Average Malpractice Settlement Can Take 18 to 24 Months

The length of time it takes to get a settlement in a medical malpractice lawsuit will vary depending on a number of factors including

Many people think medical malpractice is an invention of medical malpractice lawyers to get money.  It is not.  Before COVID-19, it was the third leading cause of death in the United States.  That is not a malpractice lawyer talking.  It is from Johns Hopkins.

Other studies in the healthcare field have shown that only a fraction of people injured by medical negligence end up bringing a claim, let alone filing a lawsuit. So the reality is that most incidents of medical malpractice never even result in litigation.

When medical malpractice does generate a lawsuit, however, there is a very strong likelihood that the lawsuit will eventually be resolved through some type of out of court settlement. Somewhere between 70-85% of all medical malpractice lawsuits get settled out of court. This means that a big part of every medical malpractice lawsuit is a continuing process of back and forth negotiation about the settlement value of the case. Most people are entirely unfamiliar with how this process works, so the goal of this post is to give you an inside look at how malpractice settlements get negotiated.

People tend to put a lot of trust in doctors and other medical providers and it can often be very shocking when they make major mistakes or provide negligent care. When you feel like you’ve been the victim of medical negligence or some type of mistake by a healthcare professional its only natural to want to take action. This typically means suing the doctor for medical malpractice. Many people who find themselves in this situation end up getting very frustrated when they can’t seem to find any medical malpractice lawyer willing to take their case.

Our Maryland medical malpractice lawyers field hundred of inquiries from prospective medical malpractice clients each month. Like most malpractice firms, we end up turning away a large percentage of these. On this page, we will look at the top four most common reasons that we end up turning down a potential medical malpractice case.

  1. Malpractice Occurred but No Harm Resulted

Our lawyers see a lot of pressure sore ulcer cases.  These bedsores come in many shapes, locations and sizes based in part on their etiology.

What Is DuoDerm?

There are a number of dressings and treatment options available. DuoDERM, a hydrocolloid, is an occlusive gel dressing that helps maintain a moist wound bed. The idea is to reduce the amount of skin breakdown that is inevitable as a result of friction that comes with life such as putting on clothes, brushing up against bedsheets, etc.

The hydrocolloid in DuoDERM helps provide absorbency and a “moist gel-like environment” that helps promote moisture to rehydrate, soften, and liquefy the tissue. On contact with the wound drainage, the hydrocolloid matrix forms a cohesive gel that supports moist wound healing.

Continue reading

We are looking at a birth injury case in Rhode Island which has given us occasion to look at medical malpractice verdicts and settlements in Rhode Island.  This is just for general information.

  • 2019, Rhode Island: $6,000,000 Settlement. This is just a tragic maternal death. A 21-year-old woman was expecting her first child. Her prenatal course was normal, and she arrived at the hospital to deliver her child a week after the due date. Her labor and delivery team planned for her to undergo cervical ripening by administering Misoprostol before inducing labor. However, Misoprostol was not approved for cervical ripening and there could be potential for serious complications to occur. A first-year resident gave the first dose of Misoprostol to the woman. At that time, the attending physician, who was not employed by the hospital, was at home but available via telephone. The woman’s contraction patterns became more frequent and intense shortly after receiving Misoprostol. The attending physician told the resident that she could only give Misoprostol if the contractions became irregular and infrequently. Despite the woman’s contractions being more frequent and consistent, the resident administered a second dose. The woman’s uterus contracted intensely. Fetal bradycardia developed and her cervix enlarged rapidly. Her cervix and uterus tore during the delivery. The baby was successfully resuscitated. However, the cervical and uterine tears caused a significant post-partum hemorrhage. The labor and delivery team attempted to save her, but she died from shock and multi-organ failure. Her son thankfully survived without any residual injuries. The woman’s family alleged that the hospital failed to properly oversee their resident and the resident negligently administered a second dose of Misoprostol. They claim that the woman would have survived had there been no second dose. The case would eventually settle for $6,000,000.
  • 2019, Rhode Island: $36,330,000 Verdict. A 58-year-old woman visited a hospital with back pain and a recent MRSA skin infection. During her second visit, an MRI revealed signs of an infection. However, the radiologist interpreted the MRI as normal. She returned two days later, with sepsis. The woman was hospitalized for an extended period because the hospital staff failed to diagnose and treat her infection. She ultimately underwent amputations to both her legs below-the-knee and eight fingers. The woman also suffered respiratory failure, kidney failure, and a heart attack that disrupted her circulation to her brain. The jury awarded $36,330,000.

Most of us have probably heard of Zika and know it is most often transmitted through mosquito bites and unprotected sex with infected people.  Zika is also linked to birth defects.

This is not a blog post about Maryland law or medical malpractice.  But we are interested in the health of babies. This is something that people need to understand.

Zika Virus

The recent decision by the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division in J.H. v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 169 A.D.3d 880 (NY App. Div. 2019) answers the question of whether a plaintiff can serve late notice of a claim upon a hospital operator. At issue, specifically in J.H., is whether a plaintiff, when there are actual knowledge and an absence of prejudice on part of the defendant, can be granted leave to serve a late notice of a claim despite lacking a reasonable excuse.

New York Law

baby-300x169Under New York’s General Municipal Law § 50–e[1][a], service of a notice of claim is a condition precedent to bringing suit against a public corporation and requires that the notice is served within 90 days after the claim accrues. Unless leave of court is made, late service of the original notice of claim is a nullity. Additionally, after the statute of limitations has run courts lack the authority to deem that late notice of claim timely served nunc pro tunc. The statute of limitations under General Municipal Law § 50–e[1][a] provides that the limitation period for commencing a tort action against a municipal corporation is one year and 90 days, however, in cases such as J.H., the statute of limitations does not expire after one year and 90 days because a plaintiffs infancy tolls the statute of limitations for 10 years.